Gathering useful recidivism data is a key step in creating smart policies that work to reduce recidivism throughout the United States, but according to the Urban Institute states need guidance on how to gather such data so it can be used as a meaningful performance measure.
As a result, the organization recently released a brief that is intended to act as a blueprint for states, so that policymakers do not have to rely on anecdotes or system-level trends when evaluating policies and programs and can instead use quantitative data to support initiatives.
As a part of their blueprint, the authors provide four steps in making recidivism a meaningful performance measure. They are:
- Definition: Use multiple measures of success.
- Collection: Develop protocols to ensure data are consistent, accurate, and timely.
- Analysis: Account for the underlying composition of the population.
- Dissemination: Package the findings to maximize impact and get the results into the hands of decision-makers.
The brief elaborates on each step, suggesting that there is no “right” measure of recidivism. Instead, the authors suggest that states should define success through a range of outcome measures that are the responsibility of multiple agencies and many different actors. According to the authors, “States should think of recidivism as a series of different performance indicators that must be carefully calibrated to the outcome they are intended to measure.”
To read the brief in its entirety, click here.
GEO Reentry Services works with correctional agencies across the country to provide day reporting programs designed to reduce recidivism and help participants successfully reenter their communities. At our day reporting centers, individuals are required to participate in cognitive behavioral therapy designed to change criminal thinking, while also undergoing life skills training, like GED, college and employment prep, parenting classes and anger management.
To read more about our approach, click here.