Outcomes Report: Philadelphia, PA

Philadelphia Prison System | October 2017

The Philadelphia Prison System funded a study entitled “Making a Difference in Offender Recidivism: Correctional Treatment Programming,” which was conducted by researchers from nearby Drexel University. The study sought to assess the effect of correctional treatment programming when delivered at Hoffman Hall, a 400-bed residential reentry center where individuals received evidence-based treatment, and a control group that did not receive these services. The study included a large sample size, 803 male participants who received treatment, and found they were 24% less likely to recidivate than the control group.

Download the report

Outcomes Report: Newark, NJ

New Jersey State Parole Board | August 2017

Upon studying 144 parolees who were referred to the Newark Residential Reentry Service Center, researchers found a decrease in recidivism risk when comparing intake and exit scores on the Level of Service Inventory test. Upon program exit, the parolees had an average decrease in risk scores of 20%. Other important findings included a one-level risk drop for most parolees and a significant decrease in subscales, particularly attitudes/orientation and education/employment.

Download the report

Outcomes Report: Burke County, NC

North Carolina Department of Corrections | July 2017

As was the case at the Robeson County Confinement in Response to Violation Center, this report assesses a change in criminal thinking at a Morganton CRV program in Burke County, NC. The state returns return violators to CRV programs for in-prison programming for up to 90 days. This study involved 221 program participants from September 2016 through February 2017, and highlights drops in criminal thinking in several areas using the Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scales.

Download the report

Outcomes Report: Robeson County, NC

North Carolina Department of Corrections | June 2017

The Justice Reinvestment Act of 2011 led to significant changes in sentencing laws in North Carolina, changes that led to revisions in practices set 20 years prior. The state decided, rather than returning technical probation violators to incarceration with no services, to return violators to unique 90-day in-custody facilities for in-prison programming for up to 90 days. In a study involving 281 program participants, this report explores how North Carolina’s Confinement in Response to Violation Centers were able to reduce criminal thinking significantly.

Download the report

Outcomes Report: Kern County Day Reporting Center

Kern County Probation Department | November 2013

One of the first to implement a non-residential reentry program with cognitive behavioral treatment in California, the Kern County Probation Department sought to measure the effectiveness of its program, designed for moderate- to high-risk probationers more likely to consume limited county resources. In this 2013 study, the county’s Research, Analysis and Data Unit compared the Kern County Day Reporting Center participant performance against a control group and current participants over a two-year period. The results found that not only did the program participants have a significantly lower rate of “no new convictions,” the study also found a much lower severity of recidivism.

Download the report

Outcomes Report: Franklin County Reentry Service Center

Franklin County, PA | December 2010

After overhauling its correctional system in 2006, Franklin County, PA., opened a non-residential reentry program for probationers that included cognitive behavioral treatment. This study compares 362 probationers who successfully completed the programming against a control group of 299 probationers who received standard probation services during a comparable period. Among other findings, researchers found a significantly lower recidivism rate for program participants versus the comparison group, 18.2% versus 47.8%, respectively.

Download the report